Friday, January 20, 2012

Week 2 Case Study Response

Math & Interactive Whiteboards

Background questions-
             This student provided information concerning how technology in the classroom can be a positive asset. They gave enough background details as to why students would achieve higher with the ability of using technology in the classroom. The after school intern did their research and wrote about what they discovered would be helpful in a classroom. It was said students will get to use Smart boards or Interactive Whiteboards to drag objects and sort and problem solve. This will engage the students to be more cooperative getting to use the “teachers stuff”.

Activity Plan-
            The intern provided two different activity plans. The first was easy to follow, I would be able to use it in a classroom myself and understand what the purpose was. Activity Plan Part 2 was harder to understand, although I could still interpret what the intern was saying. To me, it seemed a bit complicated, with uploading pictures and teaching the students how to make the pictures small icons to be accessible enough to sort into a three-part Venn diagram.

Technology Integration Rationale-
            In this activity it will widen the student’s knowledge of how to use an Interactive Whiteboard, while at the same time, learning the specific differences between shapes and sorting. With these activities the students will also learn about other subjects, or areas in math using the same activity. The intern’s use of technology says they think it should be used in a positive way to learn to the best of their ability. This activity can be made simpler or harder (depending on the students knowledge). Making the Venn diagram smaller or larger can change the toughness, and the shapes they have to sort harder to classify. The technology increases opportunities for student interaction by having an assortment of shapes and colors to organize into specific areas on a Venn diagram; including what they have in common.